Air Force Alyssa Calls Lieutenant During DUI Stop
ANOTHER MILITARY GAL IS DRUNK AS A SKKUNK AND DRIVING
Drunk Beyond Measure And Thinks She’s In Charge
By SyndicatedNews | SNN.BZ
raw police bodycam footage of a tense traffic stop in Florida that quickly escalates due to intoxication, entitlement, and misguided claims of exemption based on military service. Far from an airport or airplane incident, the encounter involves an Air Force service member behind the wheel of a white Jeep during a heavy storm on March 15, 2025. The title, “Air Force Woman Calls Lieutenant During DUI Stop,” sets the tone for what unfolds: a case of impaired driving, denial, and resistance that highlights how no one—not even those who have served—is above the law.
The incident begins when a patrolling officer observes the Jeep speeding erratically through a residential area and blowing through multiple stop signs amid pouring rain. After activating lights and sirens, the driver reacts sluggishly before finally pulling over—abruptly enough to slam into a curb. The officer approaches to find a female driver and a male passenger, both exhibiting clear signs of intoxication.
The female driver immediately emphasizes her military status, identifying herself as stationed at Eglin Air Force Base and having recently returned from deployment. She repeatedly insists she’s there “for her man” (the passenger) and shifts blame: “Oh, he’s very drunk. I’m so sorry… He’s very drunk.” Yet evidence points to her own impairment—slurred speech, fumbling with documents on her phone, and erratic behavior during the stop.
As the officer requests standard documentation (license, registration, insurance), she becomes defensive. She places a call to her lieutenant on speakerphone, explaining the situation and framing it as an unjust arrest despite having done “nothing wrong.” She refuses field sobriety exercises, declaring, “I would not like to do any sobriety exercises… I refuse.” When informed of implied consent laws and the consequences of refusal (including a potential one-year license suspension), she doubles down, citing her lawyer and repeating that she has “nothing wrong.”
The passenger, meanwhile, proves equally uncooperative. He slurs heavily, attempts to exit the vehicle against commands, and resists detention. Officers cite legal precedent (Maryland v. Wilson) allowing passengers to be detained during traffic stops for safety. He complains about treatment and demands a lawyer, while the female accuses officers of hating the military: “Why do you hate military? … You hate the military protecting your country.”
One officer, a former Air Force member who served in Iraq, tries to connect on a service-to-service level (“Airman to airman”), urging her to “act like the airman that you are.” Empathy aside, he and his colleagues enforce the law without exception. She complains of being in pain from her deployment and being handcuffed uncomfortably, while still insisting she was merely a passenger (a claim contradicted by her position behind the wheel and the driving observed).
Both individuals end up arrested and transported to jail. The vehicle is inventoried and later released to her father, who arrives on scene. Charges against the female include reckless driving, resisting arrest without violence, and traffic violations (no proof of insurance, running stop signs). The passenger faces similar charges related to resistance and impairment.
In a later court resolution, the resisting charge was dropped, and she pleaded no contest to reckless driving—resulting in six months of probation and 50 hours of community service (which she bought out for $700). The case serves as a stark reminder: military service earns respect and gratitude, but it does not grant immunity from traffic laws, DUI protocols, or accountability for dangerous behavior—especially when lives are at risk on wet roads.
The bodycam footage, presented with time-stamped transcripts and disclaimers noting that suspects are innocent until proven guilty, underscores a common theme in law enforcement encounters: entitlement and denial rarely end well. Whether someone claims deployment hardships, calls a superior, or insists on sobriety while clearly impaired, the rules apply equally. This stop, captured in full, shows the consequences when they don’t.
