SEAN COMBS TRIAL KEY DEVELOPMENT
Sean Combs and his chief of staff, Kristina Khorram
BY SNN.BZ STAFF
Sean “Diddy” Combs Trial: Key Developments and Testimony from June 2-4, 2025
The federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs continued to unfold at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse in New York City during June 2-4, 2025, with gripping testimony and significant developments. The trial, which began on May 12, 2025, centers on allegations that Combs ran a criminal enterprise involving coercion, violence, and sexual exploitation, including orchestrating drug-fueled sex parties known as “freak-offs.”
Combs has pleaded not guilty to five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Below is a detailed recap of the proceedings from June 2-4, 2025, including the attorneys, witnesses, and notable testimony that has captivated public attention.
Attorneys Involved
The prosecution team, led by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily A. Johnson, Christy Slavik, Madison Reddick Smyser, and Mitzi Steiner, has been methodically building a case to portray Combs as a manipulative figure who used his wealth and influence to control and exploit women.
The defense team, representing Combs, includes Marc Agnifilo (lead counsel), Teny Geragos, Xavier Donaldson, Jason Driscoll, Alexandra Shapiro, Brian Steel, Anna Estevao, Jonathan Bach, and Nicole Westmoreland. The defense has consistently argued that Combs’ relationships were consensual, framing the allegations as part of a “swingers lifestyle” rather than criminal activity. The trial is presided over by Judge Arun Subramanian, who has maintained a thorough and impartial demeanor, often engaging attorneys in detailed discussions to ensure clarity in rulings.
Witnesses and Testimony: June 2-4, 2025
June 2, 2025: Mia and Sylvia Oken
On June 2, the prosecution continued its case with the testimony of Mia, a former personal assistant to Combs testifying under a pseudonym, and Sylvia Oken, a custodian at the Beverly Hills Hotel. Mia’s testimony, which spanned most of the day, was a focal point of the proceedings, delivering emotionally charged and graphic accounts of alleged abuse.
- Mia: Mia, who worked for Combs from 2009 for approximately eight years, provided harrowing testimony about repeated physical and sexual assaults by Combs. She alleged that Combs raped her, forced her to perform oral sex, and on one occasion slammed a heavy door on her arm until she feared it was broken. Mia stated she felt powerless to resist due to Combs’ immense influence, saying, “I couldn’t tell him no about anything,” and described herself as “brainwashed” by his control.
She testified that she was required to promote Combs on her social media and was prohibited from posting negative content about him, even after he allegedly threw a computer at her head. During a contentious cross-examination, defense attorney Brian Steel challenged Mia’s credibility by highlighting a 2017 text message she sent after being fired, in which she threatened to kill herself, suggesting she loved her job. Mia countered, “My entire world was being ripped away from me and even if in hindsight that world was awful, I didn’t know it at the time.”
She explained her delay in coming forward by saying she was in therapy and felt compelled to testify to set an example for her nieces and goddaughters, stating, “I can’t look my niece or my goddaughters in the eyes … in the future if they happen to be in this situation.” The defense’s attempts to portray her as fabricating allegations for revenge were met with Mia’s composed den
June 4, 2025: Limited Information Available
As of June 4, 2025, specific details about trial proceedings on this date are sparse in the provided sources, suggesting that court may have been adjourned early, focused on procedural matters, or not fully reported. However, posts on X indicate ongoing public interest in the trial, with users like
@Queening_365 sharing lists of witnesses who have testified so far, including Cassie Ventura, Dawn Richard, Kid Cudi, Dawn Hughes, George Kaplan, Deonte Nash, and Capricorn Clark, among others. Another post by
@DrMessy_ referenced the June 3 testimony of Eddy Garcia, underscoring its impact. Without specific witness testimony or attorney actions reported for June 4, it’s likely that the court addressed evidentiary matters or prepared for upcoming witnesses, such as Capricorn Clark or law enforcement officers scheduled earlier in the week.
Surprising Testimony and Developments
The most striking testimony from this period came from Eddy Garcia, whose revelation about the $100,000 payment for the 2016 surveillance footage directly implicated Combs in efforts to conceal evidence of his violent behavior. This evidence strengthens the prosecution’s claim of a racketeering enterprise aimed at covering up crimes.
Mia’s graphic accounts of sexual and physical assault were also surprising for their intensity and detail, particularly her description of being “brainwashed” and her emotional testimony about testifying for the sake of younger women in her life. The defense’s aggressive cross-examination of Mia, attempting to frame her as motivated by revenge, highlighted the contentious nature of her testimony.
Another notable moment was the absence of Victim-3, a key figure in the indictment who was expected to testify about sexual coercion outside of the “freak-offs” but is no longer expected to appear, for reasons not publicly disclosed. This development raises questions about the strength of the prosecution’s case regarding additional victims beyond Cassie Ventura.
Context and Ongoing Narrative
The testimony from June 2-3 reinforced the prosecution’s narrative that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving coercion, violence, and manipulation, with employees and associates allegedly facilitating and covering up his actions. Witnesses like Mia and Garcia provided direct evidence of Combs’ control and efforts to suppress evidence, while Ferguson’s testimony offered a counterpoint that the defense used to emphasize the legitimacy of Combs’ business dealings. The defense continues to argue that Combs’ relationships, while tumultuous, were consensual and that the allegations do not constitute sex trafficking or racketeering.
Judge Subramanian’s rulings, such as denying a mistrial motion on May 28 and carefully managing the scope of testimony (e.g., limiting discussions about Kid Cudi’s dog’s state of mind), reflect his commitment to maintaining focus on relevant evidence. The trial, expected to last until mid-July, continues to draw significant attention due to its high-profile witnesses and the gravity of the charges, which could result in a life sentence for Combs if he is convicted.
The Sean Combs trial from June 2-4, 2025, featured critical testimony from Mia, Eddy Garcia, Derek Ferguson, and Sylvia Oken, with attorneys Meredith Foster, Emily A. Johnson, Christy Slavik, Madison Reddick Smyser, Mitzi Steiner, Marc Agnifilo, Teny Geragos, Xavier Donaldson, Jason Driscoll, Alexandra Shapiro, Brian Steel, Anna Estevao, Jonathan Bach, and Nicole Westmoreland shaping the legal arguments.
The most surprising revelations included Garcia’s account of the $100,000 payment to suppress assault footage and Mia’s detailed allegations of repeated abuse. As the trial progresses, the prosecution aims to solidify its case with additional witnesses, while the defense seeks to undermine the credibility of accusers and reframe Combs’ actions as consensual. The absence of Victim-3 and the ongoing focus on Cassie Ventura’s experiences remain pivotal to the case’s trajectory.
