OBAMA – CLINTON PAID TO RUIN TRUMP
BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON PAID A SPY TO RUIN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN
BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON PAID A SPY TO CREATE A FALSE NARRATIVE, PROMOTE IT THEN USED IT TO JUSTIFY SPYING ON PRESIDENT TRUMP – THIS IS NOT GOSSIP – THIS IS AMERICAN HISTORY
BY SNN.BZ STAFF
Tulsi Gabbard Declassifies Documents Alleging Treasonous Conspiracy by Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton.
In a seismic development that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified a trove of documents that she claims expose a “treasonous conspiracy” orchestrated by former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former CIA Director John Brennan, and other high-ranking officials. The documents, released on July 18, 2025, purportedly reveal a deliberate effort to undermine Donald J. Trump. Proceed to view files archives.gov/rfk.
Obama and Clinton tried their best and invested millions into ruining Trump’s 2016 presidential election victory by manufacturing and politicizing intelligence to falsely suggest Russian interference.
Gabbard asserts that these actions were not only an attack on Trump but an attempt to subvert the will of the American people, threatening the integrity of the democratic republic.
The Allegations: A “Treasonous Conspiracy” to Undermine Trump
According to Gabbard, the declassified documents provide “overwhelming evidence” that after Trump’s unexpected victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, Obama and his national security team—including James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, and Andrew McCabe—crafted a false, inflammatory story about Russian interference to delegitimize Trump’s presidency.
The documents suggest that prior to the election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia was “probably not trying” to influence the election through cyberattacks. A draft Presidential Daily Brief from December 8, 2016, explicitly stated that Russia “did not affect the recent US election results” through cyber activities. However, this assessment was allegedly suppressed, and Obama directed the creation of a new intelligence report that contradicted earlier findings, relying heavily on the discredited Steele dossier.
Gabbard, appearing on Fox News’ Hannity on July 18, 2025, described these actions as a “years-long coup” aimed at subverting the American electorate’s choice. She has referred the documents to the Department of Justice for further investigation, calling for the prosecution of those involved, including Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey, to ensure accountability and prevent such actions in the future.
“No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” Gabbard stated, emphasizing that the integrity of the democratic republic is at stake.
Hillary Clinton’s Alleged Anti-American Activities
The declassified documents also spotlight Hillary Clinton’s role in what Gabbard and her supporters describe as anti-American activities. According to the allegations, Clinton, as the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016, played a central role in funding and promoting the Steele dossier, a now-discredited report compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
The dossier, which alleged ties between Trump and Russian operatives, was financed through the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign via a law firm and opposition research firm Fusion GPS. Gabbard’s report claims that Clinton and her allies knowingly used this unreliable document to push a narrative of Russian collusion, sowing division and undermining the legitimacy of the election.
Critics of Clinton, as reflected in posts on X, have long accused her of engaging in activities that prioritize personal and political gain over national interests. Some claim that her tenure as Secretary of State involved policies that weakened U.S. sovereignty, such as her support for globalist initiatives and her handling of sensitive information through a private email server. While these claims remain contentious and lack definitive evidence in the declassified documents, they fuel the narrative that Clinton’s actions were part of a broader effort to destabilize the U.S. political system when her presidential bid failed.
Huma Abedin’s Alleged Role
Huma Abedin, a longtime aide to Hillary Clinton, has also been implicated in the controversy. Abedin, who served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the State Department and a key advisor during the 2016 campaign, has been a frequent target of speculation regarding her influence on Clinton’s policies. Critics, particularly in conservative circles, have pointed to Abedin’s family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization, as evidence of her promoting anti-American agendas.
Implications and the Path Forward
Gabbard’s declassification has reignited debates about the 2016 election and the role of intelligence agencies in shaping public perception. The documents, while heavily redacted, have prompted calls for criminal investigations into Obama-era officials, with former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey already reportedly under scrutiny. However, the Department of Justice has not confirmed whether it will pursue prosecutions based on Gabbard’s referrals, and the named officials have not publicly responded to the allegations.
The broader implications of these revelations—when substantiated (because they will be)—could be profound, raising questions about the politicization of intelligence and the erosion of public trust in democratic institutions.
Allegations of treason are extraordinarily serious and require rigorous evidence under Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which defines treason as levying war against the United States or providing aid and comfort to its enemies.
The alleged connection between Huma Abedin and her parents, Syed Zainul Abedin and Saleha Mahmood Abedin, to the Muslim Brotherhood has been a topic of controversy, primarily driven by Republican critics during Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. Below is a detailed examination of the claims, evidence, and counterarguments, based on available information, with a focus on separating fact from speculation. Given the sensitive nature of the topic, I’ve included a critical perspective on the narrative while addressing your request for a hashtag list related to this issue.
Background on Huma Abedin and Her Parents
Huma Abedin, born in 1975 in Kalamazoo, Michigan, is a longtime aide to Hillary Clinton, serving as deputy chief of staff during Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State (2009–2013) and vice chair of her 2016 presidential campaign. Her father, Syed Zainul Abedin (1928–1993), was an Indian-born scholar who founded the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) and its Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. Her mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, a Pakistani-born sociologist, took over as editor-in-chief of the journal after Syed’s death and is a professor and vice dean at Dar al-Hekma University in Saudi Arabia. The family moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, when Huma was two, where she was raised until returning to the U.S. for college at George Washington University.
Claims of Muslim Brotherhood Connections
The allegations of ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—a Sunni Islamist movement with branches across the Middle East, labeled a terrorist organization by some countries but not the U.S.—originated primarily from a 2012 letter by five Republican members of Congress, led by Rep. Michele Bachmann. The letter, sent to the State Department Inspector General, claimed Huma Abedin’s late father, mother, and brother had connections to Muslim Brotherhood operatives or organizations, raising concerns about her security clearance. These claims were amplified by conservative media, including a 2016 New York Post article and posts on X, with some labeling Huma a “Muslim Brotherhood princess.”
Specific Allegations
- Syed Zainul Abedin’s Ties:
- Syed founded the IMMA in the late 1970s, with support from Abdullah Omar Naseef, a former vice president of King Abdulaziz University and secretary-general of the Muslim World League (MWL), a Saudi-based organization. Critics, like the Center for Security Policy, allege the MWL is a significant Muslim Brotherhood entity, and Naseef’s involvement with the IMMA links Syed to the Brotherhood.
- Syed was influenced by Abul Ala Maududi, founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, an Islamist group in South Asia seen by some as ideologically similar to the Muslim Brotherhood. A letter cited in Al Arabiya claims Syed joined an “Islamic Group” led by Maududi in the 1950s, though this is not definitively tied to the Brotherhood.
- Critics point to Syed’s quotes about the Prophet Muhammad’s roles in Mecca and Medina, suggesting an ideological alignment with Islamist reform movements, though these are academic in tone and not explicit Brotherhood endorsements.
- Saleha Mahmood Abedin’s Ties:
- Saleha is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which critics claim promotes Sharia law and has featured controversial figures like John Esposito, a Georgetown professor accused of Saudi funding. A 2016 The Hill opinion piece and Al Arabiya report allege Saleha is a member of the International Islamic Council for Da’wah and Relief (IICDR), chaired by Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and represents the Muslim World League, linking her to Brotherhood-affiliated networks.
- Her 1999 dissertation and book, Women in Islam, are cited as advocating Sharia-based views on women’s rights, which critics interpret as aligning with Brotherhood ideology. A 1996 journal article under her editorship argued against recognizing single moms, working moms, or gay couples as families, fueling claims of radicalism.
- Huma Abedin’s Role:
- Huma was listed as an assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs from 1996 to 2008, overlapping with her early work for Clinton. Critics, like The Hill and New York Post, argue this role tied her to the journal’s alleged pro-Sharia stance, though her campaign stated she was a figurehead with no active editorial role.
- Her family’s academic work and her upbringing in Saudi Arabia are cited as evidence of potential Brotherhood influence, with figures like Rep. Sean Duffy and Roger Stone calling her a “Saudi asset” or implying disloyalty.
- Posts on X in 2025, such as by @Starboy2079 and @GoodWoo2, claim Huma’s parents were senior Brotherhood members, tying her to the group through her family and her marriage to Alex Soros, though these lack primary evidence.
Counterarguments and Fact-Checking
Family Context: Syed Abedin was described by Harvard professor Ali Asani as a “moderate Muslim” who hosted inclusive conferences, including with neoconservative scholar Bernard Lewis. Saleha’s affiliations with groups like the IICDR are not definitively tied to active Brotherhood operations, and her academic work focuses on Muslim minority issues, not terrorism.
Bipartisan Rebuttals: Republican leaders like John McCain, John Boehner, and Nancy Pelosi criticized the 2012 Bachmann letter as a “smear” and “paranoid,” defending Huma’s loyalty. McCain praised her as embodying American ideals. A 2016 bipartisan congressional review found no substantiation for the claims.
Security Clearance: Huma underwent rigorous vetting for her State Department role, which included checks for conflicting allegiances. No issues were flagged, suggesting her background was deemed non-threatening.
Journal Context: The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is not owned by the Muslim World League, as some claim, and its Saudi funding does not inherently tie it to the Brotherhood, especially since Saudi Arabia banned the group as a terrorist organization. Huma’s role was nominal, and the journal’s content, while conservative in some articles, is academic, not extremist.
