MARK ZUCKERBERG PEEKING AT BREASTS

zuck0

ZUCKERBERG ENJOYING BEZOS 'S GIRLFRIEND WHILESITTING NEXT TO HIS WIFE

BY SNN.BZ STAFF

Mark Zuckerberg’s journey from being a college student to becoming the CEO of Meta (formerly Facebook) has been marked by several controversial incidents along the way, albeit, created at his own hand. Has he matured? Absolutely. Have his core principals matured? No. His values remain the same.

Most GenZ’s don’t even know that Facebook was stolen because they were born between 1997 and 2012 which means they would have been anywhere between 13 years of age where Facebook would have not interested them since it was a “college aged thing” and 28 years of age that would have considered the event just a news item about a stolen internet business.


The Facemash Incident (2003) occurred while Zuckerberg was still a student at Harvard. The Facemash website allowed male students to rate the attractiveness of Harvard’s female students, asking males if the image of the female student was “Hot or Not?” Talk about nauseatingly misogynistic. Zuckerberg created the website using photos taken from the university’s online directories without anyone’s permission – he just did it.



Facemash was quickly shut down by Harvard, and Zuckerberg faced disciplinary action. His lack of integrity and character is why he had free time on his hands to begin with and was able to take on “The Facebook” short term coding gig.

The Facebook Controversy (2004) In early 2004, the Winklevoss twins hired Zuckerberg for a coding job. He changed the passwords, locked them out and launched “The Facebook” from his Harvard dorm room as though he had invented it and owned it. He was actually telling on himself when he was texted the question, “Are you going to screw them (the Winklevoss brothers) over? And he responded. “Yeah, I’m going to fuck them.” The text message was part of the legal proceedings so we are not sharing a secret.




The Facebook theft led to a legal dispute with the Winklevoss twins and Divya Narendra, who claimed that Zuckerberg had stolen their idea for a social networking site called HarvardConnection (later renamed ConnectU). The dispute was settled in 2008, with the Winklevoss twins receiving $65 million.

The 3D Video Glasses Controversy was another Zuckerberg problem with similar characteristics. In 2022, Zuckerberg faced criticism for incorporating technology related to 3D video glasses into Meta’s projects without proper acknowledgment or compensation to the original developers. This issue highlighted concerns about privacy and the ethical use of technology.

Privacy Concerns and Federal Funding (2015-2025) Over the past decade, Zuckerberg and Meta have been accused of accepting significant federal funding to enhance surveillance capabilities that only benefited members of the Democratic Party.

Zuckerberg helped build quite the farce against Trump’s work using a false narrative that had been created for Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Initiative by Christopher Steele. At the time, George Stephanopoulos had worked for the Clintons for years as part of “The Deep State” in the USA (later transitioning to journalism). These actions have raised concerns about privacy and the ethical implications of data collection and usage more importantly about the entire falsehood and the millions invested in carrying out that initiative.

Then at President Trump’s second inauguration in January 2025, Zuckerberg was photographed sitting next to Jeff Bezos’ fiancée, Lauren Sanchez. He was caught on camera peering down her cleavage, which drew public criticism. This was the second time he was photographed staring down at her breasts.




“However, it’s not entirely fair to place the blame for Zuckerberg’s gaze on Sanchez’s cleavage solely on him. Sanchez is known for wearing provocative outfits, similar to those favored by Kanye’s new wife. Given Sanchez’s success as a businesswoman, it’s curious that she chooses to mirror the style of Bianca Censori, but she does.” At Art Basel just last year in Miami, Censori was thought to be seen out naked – but she wasn’t naked – just barely so.


As an online publication, we at SNN.BZ are very appreciative that society as a whole is studying what is offered as acceptable or “newsy” versus what is actually malicious and damaging when writing about a person.

In this case, we have not peeked into Censori’s or Sanchez’s homes or offices. We are referring to the manner in which these two ladies have been dressed and photographed in public.

To that end, we add YouTube published videos that well display the two women’s outfits that they were out in public which is where we got so much information about their physical attributes.

These videos were filmed in public where no one has a legal right to or expectation of privacy.