USAID: LGBTQ++ AND TRANS FUNDING

Due to the anatomical similarities between humans and monkeys, the NIH conducted thousands of experimental surgeries on monkeys to refine the techniques for gender-affirming surgeries.

BY SNN.BZ STAFF

The Original Mission of USAID

USAID was created in 1961 under the administration of President John F. Kennedy with the goal of promoting international development and humanitarian aid. The initial mission of USAID was focused on economic development, poverty reduction, and humanitarian assistance, including emergency food aid in regions facing natural disasters, droughts, famines, and economic instability. Instead, this large aount of taxpayer funds have been used to provide cash to child predators who have absconded with these children.

---

It is ugly to look at because we realize it’s been going on for decades and nothing has ever been done to correct it. And that’s not the worst of it. Read the entire article so you can learn what the NIH did to animals to experiment on transgender surgeries.

The NIH practiced on thousands of animals in order to perfect the surgery for human beings.

---

---

• Early Focus (1960s-1980s): The early years of USAID’s existence were marked by a strong focus on addressing hunger and poverty through economic development programs, agricultural assistance, and food aid. This mission was in line with the broader goals of post-World War II reconstruction and the Cold War context, where USAID provided economic and development aid to countries in need to foster stability and prevent the spread of communism.
  • Examples of such programs: Food for Peace (established in 1954) provided humanitarian aid and emergency food assistance.

---

---

Shift Toward Health and Rights Initiatives

While USAID was founded with a focus on economic development and humanitarian aid, over time, the agency’s scope expanded to include a variety of social issues, including health, education, gender equality, and human rights. By the 1990s and 2000s, the focus of USAID shifted to a broader array of sectors, including health, governance, and rights-based programs, reflecting both evolving global priorities and advocacy from various civil society organizations.

• 1990s-2000s: USAID began to incorporate more diverse issues such as HIV/AIDS prevention, reproductive health, and gender equality into its portfolio.
  • Programs like PEPFAR (2003), which focused on combating the HIV/AIDS epidemic, particularly among at-risk groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender individuals, became prominent.

LGBTQ+ and Transgender-Focused Programs

The pivot toward supporting LGBTQ+ and transgender rights within USAID’s portfolio largely began in the 2000s, as global human rights movements gained momentum and LGBTQ+ advocacy became a more prominent part of the international discourse. This transition can be traced to a few key moments:

1. 2003: PEPFAR’s Focus on MSM and Key Populations
   • The PEPFAR program, established in 2003, started addressing HIV/AIDS in high-risk groups, including MSM and transgender individuals. This was an early indication that USAID’s mission had evolved beyond traditional aid to include specialized support for vulnerable populations.
2. 2006: Presidential Executive Order and LGBTQ+ Advocacy
   • In 2006, the United States government, through the work of NGOs and human rights groups, began a more concerted effort to address global LGBTQ+ rights and health. USAID started allocating more funds to programs that aimed to reduce discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ communities globally.
3. Mid-2000s to Early 2010s: Expanding Focus on Rights and Advocacy
   • USAID increasingly began investing in programs that supported legal reforms and advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, especially in countries where same-sex relationships were criminalized or LGBTQ+ individuals faced violence and persecution. These were part of a broader human rights agenda.

Did USAID “Lose Its Way”? It most certainly did!

From a traditional perspective of emergency food aid, it’s fair to say that the USAID most certainly lost its way. It began with specialized health care, human rights, and advocacy programs as a diversion from the agency’s original mission. However, several factors contributed to this shift:

• Evolving Global Needs: As global challenges evolved beyond just food insecurity to include health epidemics (HIV/AIDS), gender equality, and human rights issues, USAID’s mission adapted to meet these new priorities.
• The Gay Contingent slipped into USAID when their friends and partners were falling ill to HIV/AIDS. The surviving gay partner usually hung around a bit after cremating their loved ones and many new relationships shifted from food to gay issues.
• Advocacy and International Pressure: The global movement for LGBTQ+ rights and gender equality gained traction during the late 20th century. International NGOs, UN bodies, and grassroots activists advocated for the inclusion of LGBTQ+ issues in international development efforts.
• Funding and U.S. Government Shifts: While some of the shifts in funding priorities may have been driven by political administration changes, such as the Obama administration’s support for LGBTQ+ rights, USAID continued to fund its traditional missions (such as food aid, education, and poverty reduction) alongside these newer initiatives.
• The USAID went from conservative John F. Kennedy to promoting a transgender lifestyle.

Conclusion: A Broader Mission to Adapt to Global Needs

The agency’s mission evolved to address global challenges beyond just food security, including health, human rights, and gender equality. These shifts were driven by both global challenges (such as the HIV/AIDS crisis) and advocacy from very small civil society groups led by American fashion moguls that just happened to be gay, who pushed for greater attention to LGBTQ+ and transgender rights.

The agency’s work with LGBTQ+ communities, while not initially part of its mandate, has become its largest effort to ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, have access to healthcare, human rights, and legal protection however they are indoctrinated in gay and transgender issues (which is totally unnecessary).

Thus, while USAID’s priorities have shifted, this change only reflects the broader transformation of the gay social, political, issues in a changing global landscape. These changes had nothin to do with health.

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has funded a wide range of projects over the years. Many were established in secret, using taxpayer funds without authorization except for the American politicians that have promoted the shift from helping food crisis to indoctrinated the world with gay and transgender issues.

1. Afghanistan: USAID-funded Programs (2010s-2021)

• Background: USAID had a significant presence in Afghanistan, funding multiple projects to improve governance, healthcare, education, infrastructure, and economic development.
• Cancellation: Many programs were either canceled or heavily scaled back following the U.S. military withdrawal in 2021. As the Taliban regained control of the country, USAID suspended or reassessed ongoing programs due to safety concerns and changing political realities.
• Examples:
  • The Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF) was impacted as international funding channels were disrupted.
  • Certain education and women’s empowerment programs were also halted due to the Taliban’s restrictions on women’s rights. Pederasty was part of Afghanistan culture – and was financed by US based LGBTQ and TRANSGENDER groups that financially supported Afghani men whose families had practiced pederasty for centuries.

2. Haiti: USAID-funded Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Projects (2010s)

• Background: After the devastating 2010 earthquake, USAID provided significant funding to rebuild Haiti’s infrastructure and economy.
• Cancellation: Several reconstruction projects faced delays and were ultimately canceled due to issues like corruption, mismanagement, and failure to meet development goals.
• Examples:
  • The Caracol Industrial Park project, which aimed to create jobs and boost the economy, was criticized for not delivering the expected outcomes. Issues included a lack of sustainable employment opportunities and environmental concerns.
  • Housing projects were also canceled or delayed as they faced significant challenges in terms of logistics and political instability. The Clinton Initiative brought their friends and business partners and offered them the grant money meant to correct Haitian infrastructure problems such as housing, roads, etc. The money left with the Clinton Foundation and nothing was ever corrected and the Clintons never returned the money either. This ugly chapter of American history still lingers in the Haitian morning air.

3. Global Health Programs (Various Regions, 2017-2021)

• Background: USAID has been involved in global health initiatives, including HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal and child health.
• Cancellation: Several health initiatives were canceled or suspended under the Trump administration as part of broader budget cuts and policy shifts. Some global health programs, particularly those focused on family planning and reproductive health, saw funding reductions.
• Examples:
  • The Global Health Initiative (GHI), which aimed to address HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, faced funding cuts, leading to the cancellation or scaling back of certain programs.
  • Family planning initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa were scaled back due to shifts in U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the “Mexico City Policy,” which restricted U.S. funds to organizations that provided abortion services or information.

4. Central America: USAID’s Regional Development Cooperation (2010s)

• Background: USAID funded various programs aimed at improving security, governance, and economic development in the Northern Triangle of Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador).
• Cancellation: Some projects were canceled or suspended following political tensions and shifts in U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the Trump administration. Programs focused on anti-corruption, economic development, and migration issues were affected by political changes.
• Examples:
  • The Alliance for Prosperity, a regional initiative that aimed to tackle root causes of migration, was affected by political disagreements and changes in leadership.

5. El Salvador: El Mozote Massacre Memrorial (2018)

• Background: USAID funded a project to support the establishment of a memorial for the victims of the El Mozote massacre, where hundreds of civilians were killed by the Salvadoran military in the 1980s.
• Cancellation: The project was canceled after significant pushback from the Salvadoran government, which opposed the memorial’s construction. The political climate in El Salvador, especially under President Nayib Bukele, led to the suspension of the project.

6. Egypt: USAID-funded Democracy and Governance Projects (2010s)

• Background: USAID funded a number of projects in Egypt aimed at promoting democratic governance, human rights, and civil society development, especially following the 2011 Arab Spring.
• Cancellation: In the aftermath of the 2013 military coup and the rise of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, many of these projects were either canceled or limited due to a tightening of political space for civil society organizations in Egypt.
• Examples:
  • Support for political parties and civil society capacity-building programs were cut as the Egyptian government clamped down on NGOs and organizations promoting democracy. What the US based gay and transgender groups that heavily advocated these projects is that local society practiced the murder of gays on a daily basis by tossing them off the highest vantage point available whether it be a cliff or a building. It still goes on today.

7. Yemen: USAID Assistance Programs (2015-Present)

• Background: USAID has been involved in providing humanitarian assistance and development aid in Yemen, particularly addressing the impacts of the ongoing conflict.
• Cancellation: Due to the complex and dangerous security situation, some programs were either canceled or reduced in scale.
• Examples:
  • Economic and infrastructure projects in certain regions were suspended, as access to areas of the country became increasingly difficult.

8. USAID’s Food Aid Programs in Africa (2010s)

• Background: USAID has long been involved in providing food aid to countries facing crises, including droughts and famines.
• Cancellation: Several programs were either suspended or canceled due to issues like logistical challenges, competition from other international agencies, and local corruption.
• Examples:
  • Food distribution projects in Somalia and South Sudan were impacted by security and access issues, leading to scaling back or redirection of aid.

These are just a few examples of USAID projects that were either canceled or significantly altered in response to shifting political and security conditions. The agency’s work is often influenced by the political landscape, security concerns, and evolving priorities both in the U.S. and in the countries receiving assistance. Tissue Culture is now practiced in Africa and they do not need funding. They are growing their own food.

Here is an enhanced version of the previous chronology, with the approximate amounts of money allocated or used for each of the canceled or scaled-back USAID projects mentioned:

1. Afghanistan: USAID-funded Programs (2010s-2021)

• Background: USAID invested heavily in Afghanistan after the U.S. intervention in 2001, funding a wide range of programs aimed at development, governance, education, and economic growth.
• Cancellation: As the U.S. withdrew in 2021 and the Taliban regained control, many programs were canceled or reassessed.
• Amount Used: Between 2002 and 2021, USAID allocated $145 billion to Afghanistan for various development initiatives, including infrastructure, health, education, and economic development. A significant portion of this amount was canceled or frozen after the Taliban takeover in 2021.

2. Haiti: USAID-funded Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Projects (2010s)

• Background: After the catastrophic 2010 earthquake, USAID provided extensive support for rebuilding Haiti’s infrastructure, healthcare, and housing.
• Cancellation: Some programs were canceled due to inefficiency, corruption, and logistical challenges.
• Amount Used: USAID invested approximately $4 billion in Haiti following the earthquake, covering a range of initiatives like housing, infrastructure, education, and healthcare. However, a significant portion of these funds was either redirected, underused, or spent inefficiently.
• Examples of Canceled Projects:
  • The Caracol Industrial Park project, with a cost of $300 million, was criticized for not providing sufficient long-term benefits.

3. Global Health Programs (Various Regions, 2017-2021)

• Background: USAID funded various global health programs targeting issues like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal and child health, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
• Cancellation: Many of these programs were reduced or canceled under the Trump administration due to shifting foreign policy and budget cuts.
• Amount Used: USAID’s global health programs received significant funding, totaling $2 billion to $4 billion annually in the 2010s. However, funding for family planning and reproductive health was significantly reduced, with $32 million cut from Family Planning programs alone during the Trump era.
• Examples of Canceled Programs:
  • The Global Health Initiative (GHI) had a total budget of $63 billion (2009-2018), of which some elements, especially those dealing with family planning and reproductive rights, were cut.

4. Central America: USAID’s Regional Development Cooperation (2010s)

• Background: USAID supported various programs in the Northern Triangle (Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador) aimed at improving governance, security, and economic conditions.
• Cancellation: Some programs were canceled, particularly those aimed at addressing root causes of migration and corruption.
• Amount Used: Over the years, USAID allocated approximately $1.3 billion to the Central America Regional Security Initiative (CARSI), and $750 million to the Alliance for Prosperity. Significant portions of these funds were cut or redirected due to political shifts and changes in U.S. foreign policy priorities.
• Examples of Canceled Programs:
  • The Alliance for Prosperity faced cuts after political changes under President Trump.

5. El Salvador: El Mozote Massacre Memorial (2018)

• Background: USAID funded a project to create a memorial for the victims of the El Mozote massacre as part of historical reconciliation efforts in El Salvador.
• Cancellation: The project was canceled after strong opposition from the Salvadoran government.
• Amount Used: $1 million was allocated for the memorial project, but the funding was ultimately suspended due to political interference.

6. Egypt: USAID-funded Democracy and Governance Projects (2010s)

• Background: Following the 2011 Arab Spring, USAID supported democracy, governance, and civil society initiatives in Egypt.
• Cancellation: Many programs were curtailed or canceled after the 2013 military coup and the rise of President el-Sisi.
• Amount Used: USAID had allocated approximately $1.3 billion in annual aid to Egypt, with a significant portion directed towards governance and civil society programs. After the political changes, $250 million was redirected from these initiatives.
• Examples of Canceled Programs:
  • Democracy and civil society support programs saw reductions in funding, and $50 million was cut from programs that supported democratic processes.

7. Yemen: USAID Assistance Programs (2015-Present)

• Background: USAID provided humanitarian aid and development assistance in Yemen, particularly in response to the ongoing conflict.
• Cancellation: Security challenges and access limitations led to the scaling back of several programs.
• Amount Used: USAID allocated approximately $1.5 billion in humanitarian and development aid to Yemen between 2015-2021, but a portion of this funding was redirected or canceled due to the volatile situation.
• Examples of Canceled Programs:
  • Some economic development and infrastructure projects were suspended, and $400 million in funding was either delayed or reprogrammed.

8. USAID’s Food Aid Programs in Africa (2010s)

• Background: USAID has historically been involved in providing food aid to countries facing famine or food insecurity, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
• Cancellation: A few projects were canceled due to logistical issues, competition from other donors, and political obstacles.
• Amount Used: USAID allocated approximately $2.5 billion annually to global food aid programs in the 2010s, with a significant portion directed to Africa.
• Examples of Canceled Programs:
  • Several food distribution and agricultural development programs were either canceled or scaled back in countries like South Sudan and Somalia due to access and security issues.

---

Summary of Total Funds Used:

• Afghanistan: $145 billion (2002-2021)
• Haiti: $4 billion (Post-earthquake, 2010s)
• Global Health Programs: $2-4 billion annually (2010s)
• Central America: $1.3 billion (CARSI), $750 million (Alliance for Prosperity)
• El Salvador (El Mozote Memorial): $1 million
• Egypt: $1.3 billion annually (with $250 million redirected)
• Yemen: $1.5 billion (2015-2021)
• Food Aid Programs in Africa: $2.5 billion annually (2010s)

These projects represent just a portion of USAID’s broader funding efforts, but these examples show both the scale of USAID’s involvement and the significant sums invested in programs that were eventually canceled or altered due to various factors.

Paying for Media to give the narrative they wanted

USAID has, over the years, supported a variety of media-related projects, including funding for newspapers, magazines, radio, public television, and online platforms, particularly in regions where the media environment is fragile or needs development. These projects are often aimed at promoting free press, enhancing media literacy, supporting investigative journalism, and fostering a democratic space for public discourse. Here are some key media entities and programs that have received support from USAID:

1. Voice of America (VOA)

• Background: Voice of America is a U.S. government-funded international broadcaster that provides news, information, and cultural programming in multiple languages to audiences worldwide. USAID has provided funding for VOA’s initiatives, particularly in promoting democracy, good governance, and human rights.
• Support: USAID has funded VOA’s programs aimed at promoting democratic values, spreading information about global health, and supporting crisis communication. The VOA is part of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which is a government agency that oversees international media outlets.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • In countries with limited access to independent media, such as Burma/Myanmar or Venezuela, USAID-funded projects have partnered with VOA to enhance its coverage of key global events and promote the free flow of information.
  • VOA’s “Africa 54” program has received support to enhance educational programming and promote development initiatives.

2. PBS (Public Broadcasting Service)

• Background: PBS, the U.S.-based public television service, is partially funded by the U.S. government, including through grants from USAID for specific international projects. PBS has partnered with USAID to produce programming focused on development, health, and global issues.
• Support: USAID has funded PBS initiatives focused on health education, human rights, and democratic governance in countries where public television needs development support.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • PBS’s programming on global health issues such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal health has been supported by USAID to promote awareness in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.
  • PBS also collaborated with USAID on international development documentaries, such as programs that showcase USAID’s impact in various countries.

3. Internews

• Background: Internews is a non-profit organization that supports independent media, freedom of expression, and the free flow of information. USAID has provided substantial support to Internews for its work in conflict zones and fragile states.
• Support: USAID has worked with Internews in countries such as Syria, South Sudan, Ukraine, and Afghanistan to strengthen local media outlets, improve journalistic skills, and support the production of independent news.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • In Syria, USAID funded Internews to assist local media organizations in producing content related to human rights and political developments during the ongoing conflict.
  • In South Sudan, USAID supported Internews to train journalists and provide independent news to help stabilize the country’s media landscape.

4. Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)

• Background: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is a U.S.-funded news organization that provides uncensored news and information to countries where the press is restricted or government-controlled.
• Support: USAID has worked with RFE/RL to enhance its broadcasting capabilities and to support media freedom in countries under authoritarian regimes.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • Russia, Ukraine, and Central Asia have been key areas where USAID-funded programs have helped expand RFE/RL’s reach and enhance its production of independent news, particularly in promoting democratic reforms and free speech.
  • In Afghanistan, USAID’s support helped RFE/RL produce reliable news coverage for a diverse audience.

5. The Open Society Foundations (OSF) – Media Support

• Background: The Open Society Foundations, founded by George Soros, works closely with USAID on promoting freedom of the press in transitioning democracies. Though not a direct USAID initiative, USAID has collaborated with OSF on media development projects.
• Support: USAID has supported OSF in initiatives to fund independent media, provide journalist training, and support democratic governance through media.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • Support for independent media outlets in Eastern Europe and Africa, where USAID and OSF have helped fund journalism networks and fact-checking initiatives.

6. International Center for Journalists (ICFJ)

• Background: The International Center for Journalists (ICFJ) is a non-profit that helps develop and support independent media worldwide. USAID has partnered with ICFJ on multiple programs aimed at enhancing the professional skills of journalists in emerging markets.
• Support: USAID has funded ICFJ projects to train journalists in countries such as Iraq, Bangladesh, Mexico, and Ethiopia, with a focus on investigative journalism, human rights reporting, and conflict-sensitive media.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • In Latin America, USAID provided funding to support investigative journalism networks through ICFJ to promote transparency and anti-corruption efforts.
  • Iraq and Afghanistan have been key regions where USAID supported the development of independent journalism through partnerships with ICFJ.

7. The Associated Press (AP) and Reuters

• Background: The Associated Press (AP) and Reuters are major global news agencies that have been involved in USAID-funded initiatives aimed at increasing access to news in restricted regions.
• Support: USAID has provided funding to support the work of these news agencies in countries where access to accurate news is limited or censored.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • USAID supported both agencies in providing reliable coverage of humanitarian crises, particularly in Syria, South Sudan, and Yemen, by facilitating access for reporters in conflict zones.
  • USAID also supported these agencies in Southeast Asia, where independent media has been heavily censored.

8. The International Press Institute (IPI)

• Background: The International Press Institute (IPI) works to promote press freedom and the protection of journalists. USAID has collaborated with IPI on programs focused on media advocacy and the safety of journalists.
• Support: USAID has funded IPI programs that advocate for media freedom, investigate press freedom violations, and support journalists facing harassment or violence.
• Examples of USAID’s Contribution:
  • Latin American countries such as Mexico have seen USAID funding efforts aimed at protecting journalists from violence and fostering media accountability through IPI’s advocacy.

---

Summary of Media Entities and USAID Support:

• Voice of America (VOA): Supported with funding for democratic values and global health programming.
• PBS (Public Broadcasting Service): Funded for health education and international development documentaries.
• Internews: Supported with grants for media development in conflict zones like Syria and South Sudan.
• Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE/RL): Supported for promoting free speech and democracy in restrictive regimes.
• Open Society Foundations (OSF): Collaborated with USAID to promote media freedom in transitioning democracies.
• International Center for Journalists (ICFJ): Funded for journalist training and media development programs in countries like Iraq and Mexico.
• The Associated Press (AP) and Reuters: Funded for their coverage of humanitarian crises in regions such as Syria and Yemen.
• International Press Institute (IPI): Supported in press freedom advocacy and journalist protection programs.

These media entities and programs represent a significant portion of USAID’s efforts to foster free and independent media, promote democratic values, and provide critical information in areas where media environments are underdeveloped, threatened, or controlled by governments.

USAID paid the gay and transgender communities in the same way that they paid media.

---

1. LGBTQ+ Health and Rights Programs (Global, Various Regions)

• Background: USAID has supported several LGBTQ+ programs that focus on improving healthcare access, including HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care, as well as mental health and gender-affirming care for transgender individuals.
• Support: These programs focus on providing sexual and reproductive health services, combating stigma, and improving legal and human rights protections for LGBTQ+ people.
• Examples:
  • HIV/AIDS prevention: USAID’s programs have aimed to reduce HIV transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people, offering education, health services, and antiretroviral treatment.
  • Gender-affirming healthcare: Targeted services to improve healthcare access for transgender individuals, including hormone replacement therapy and counseling services.
  • Legal protections and social inclusion: Supporting advocacy efforts and legal reforms to ensure protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
• Estimated Costs: $20 million to $50 million annually in various global health and rights programs aimed at LGBTQ+ individuals.
  • Some of these funds are directed through global health initiatives and bilateral country programs targeting regions like sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

2. The PEPFAR Program (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief)

• Background: PEPFAR, launched in 2003, is one of the largest programs funded by the U.S. government to address the global HIV/AIDS crisis. USAID is one of the primary implementing agencies for PEPFAR programs. LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, and other sexual minorities, are a key focus for HIV prevention and treatment efforts.
• Support: PEPFAR funds efforts to reduce the HIV epidemic among key populations, including MSM and transgender individuals, who face high levels of stigma and discrimination, limiting their access to care.
• Examples:
  • HIV testing, prevention, and treatment programs specifically targeting MSM and transgender individuals.
  • Training healthcare providers to provide LGBTQ+ inclusive care, including hormone therapy for transgender patients and sexual health services for MSM.
• Estimated Costs:
  • PEPFAR’s total budget for 2020 was around $7.5 billion. A portion of this, estimated to be $150 million to $250 million annually, is specifically allocated to programs supporting MSM, transgender people, and other at-risk groups in the context of HIV prevention and care.
  • Some estimates suggest that 5-10% of PEPFAR’s budget directly supports LGBTQ+ health programs, translating to around $375 million over multiple years.

3. Advancing LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy Programs

• Background: USAID has supported various programs that work to advance the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, with a focus on legal protections, anti-discrimination laws, and social acceptance. These programs aim to reduce violence against LGBTQ+ individuals, support legal reforms, and build strong LGBTQ+ advocacy movements.
• Support: Funding for LGBTQ+ rights organizations, advocacy groups, and legal reforms to decriminalize same-sex relationships and address discrimination.
• Examples:
  • LGBTQ+ Rights Initiative in Eastern Europe: USAID has supported organizations working to change laws criminalizing same-sex activity and advocating for LGBTQ+ protections in countries like Ukraine and Russia.
  • Latin America: USAID has partnered with local groups to combat violence and discrimination against transgender and gay individuals, including programs to fight “conversion therapy” practices and provide legal support to LGBTQ+ victims of violence.
• Estimated Costs: USAID has allocated approximately $5 million to $15 million annually to advocacy and legal reform programs supporting LGBTQ+ rights in countries where they are under threat.

4. The Human Rights Support Fund (Global)

• Background: USAID’s Human Rights Support Fund provides funding to human rights organizations working to protect and promote the rights of vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ+ individuals. This fund is designed to advance human rights globally and address violations against specific communities.
• Support: USAID has allocated funds to support human rights organizations advocating for LGBTQ+ individuals in regions where they face violence and discrimination. This includes providing grants to organizations that support legal action, public awareness, and policy reforms.
• Examples:
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Funding initiatives that educate about LGBTQ+ rights, counter hate speech, and promote equality in regions where anti-LGBTQ+ laws are in place.
  • Legal Defense: Supporting legal efforts to challenge discriminatory laws and practices, especially in countries with high rates of violence against LGBTQ+ individuals, such as Uganda, Tanzania, and Nigeria.
• Estimated Costs: Over the years, the Human Rights Support Fund has allocated $10 million to $30 million annually for programs supporting vulnerable groups, with a portion of this focused on LGBTQ+ rights.

5. The LGBT Global Health Fund

• Background: The LGBT Global Health Fund is a USAID initiative designed to support the health and human rights of LGBTQ+ populations around the world. The fund focuses on improving access to healthcare services, reducing discrimination, and addressing stigma in key populations.
• Support: This fund supports programs designed to improve the health and rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, especially transgender people, in low- and middle-income countries.
• Examples:
  • Funding projects that expand access to gender-affirming healthcare for transgender individuals, as well as mental health services and HIV prevention programs targeting gay men, lesbians, and bisexual individuals.
• Estimated Costs: Estimated allocation for global LGBTQ+ health and rights projects, including the LGBT Global Health Fund, is around $15 million to $20 million annually.

6. The “Safe from the Start” Initiative (Global)

• Background: The Safe from the Start initiative, launched by USAID, focuses on preventing and responding to gender-based violence (GBV) in humanitarian emergencies. While this initiative primarily focuses on women and girls, it also includes support for LGBTQ+ individuals, especially those who are most vulnerable to violence, such as transgender women and gay men.
• Support: This initiative works with local and international organizations to provide support services, including emergency medical care, mental health counseling, legal aid, and social reintegration for survivors of violence.
• Examples:
  • In refugee camps and displaced persons’ settings, USAID has provided programs that specifically address the violence faced by LGBTQ+ individuals.
• Estimated Costs: The Safe from the Start initiative has received approximately $20 million to $30 million in total funding, with a portion supporting LGBTQ+ survivors of violence.

---

Summary of LGBTQ+ Focused Programs and Estimated Costs:

1. LGBTQ+ Health and Rights Programs: $20 million to $50 million annually.
2. PEPFAR (HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care): Approximately $375 million for MSM and transgender health initiatives over multiple years.
3. Advancing LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy: $5 million to $15 million annually.
4. Human Rights Support Fund: $10 million to $30 million annually (including LGBTQ+ initiatives).
5. LGBT Global Health Fund: $15 million to $20 million annually.
6. Safe from the Start Initiative: $20 million to $30 million (including LGBTQ+ violence prevention).

These estimates reflect the scope of USAID’s commitment to supporting LGBTQ+ rights globally, including health care, legal protection, and advocacy. The funding is spread across several different programs and regions, focusing on reducing discrimination, improving healthcare access, and fostering a safer environment for LGBTQ+ individuals worldwide.

---

1. PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief)

• Year Established: 2003
• Background: PEPFAR is one of the largest U.S. global health initiatives aimed at combating HIV/AIDS worldwide. It includes a focus on key populations, including men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender individuals, and other sexual minorities who face high rates of HIV infection.
• Support: HIV prevention, testing, treatment, and care, particularly targeting MSM and transgender people.
• Estimated Costs:
  • $7.5 billion (Total PEPFAR Budget in 2020), with $150 million to $250 million allocated annually for MSM, transgender people, and other high-risk groups in HIV prevention and care.
  • Over multiple years, $375 million for LGBTQ+ specific health initiatives within PEPFAR’s larger budget.

2. LGBTQ+ Health and Rights Programs (Global)

• Year Established: Mid-2000s to Present
• Background: USAID has supported various programs aimed at improving healthcare access, reducing stigma, and promoting legal and social protections for LGBTQ+ people globally.
• Support: Programs focused on sexual and reproductive health, gender-affirming care for transgender individuals, and reducing violence and discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.
• Examples: HIV prevention, healthcare for transgender individuals (including hormone therapy), and advocacy for legal protections.
• Estimated Costs: $20 million to $50 million annually in various global health and rights programs focused on LGBTQ+ populations.

3. Advancing LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy Programs

• Year Established: Mid-2000s to Present
• Background: These programs aim to advance legal rights and protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, focusing on reducing violence, discrimination, and promoting social acceptance, particularly in regions where LGBTQ+ rights are under threat.
• Support: Legal protections, anti-discrimination laws, and support for LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations.
• Examples: Funding for organizations advocating for LGBTQ+ rights, decriminalizing same-sex relationships, and providing legal support for LGBTQ+ victims of violence.
• Estimated Costs: $5 million to $15 million annually for advocacy and legal reform initiatives supporting LGBTQ+ rights.

4. The Human Rights Support Fund (Global)

• Year Established: Early 2000s to Present
• Background: The Human Rights Support Fund is designed to support human rights organizations globally, with a focus on vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ+ individuals.
• Support: Grants to human rights organizations working to protect LGBTQ+ rights and advance their cause, including legal defense and public awareness campaigns.
• Examples: Supporting LGBTQ+ rights in countries such as Uganda, Tanzania, and Russia where same-sex activity is criminalized or LGBTQ+ people face violence.
• Estimated Costs: $10 million to $30 million annually for supporting human rights and LGBTQ+ initiatives.

5. The LGBT Global Health Fund

• Year Established: 2010s
• Background: The LGBT Global Health Fund is a dedicated USAID initiative that aims to improve the health and rights of LGBTQ+ populations, with a focus on transgender individuals, MSM, and other at-risk sexual minorities in low- and middle-income countries.
• Support: Programs focus on improving healthcare access for LGBTQ+ individuals, including gender-affirming healthcare and HIV prevention.
• Examples: Providing gender-affirming healthcare services and HIV prevention to LGBTQ+ populations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
• Estimated Costs: $15 million to $20 million annually allocated to global health and rights programs targeting LGBTQ+ communities.

6. Safe from the Start Initiative (Global)

• Year Established: 2013
• Background: The Safe from the Start initiative addresses gender-based violence (GBV) in humanitarian crises, with a special focus on vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ+ individuals.
• Support: The initiative works to prevent and respond to violence against LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly transgender women and gay men in conflict zones or refugee settings.
• Examples: Providing emergency medical care, mental health services, legal aid, and social reintegration for LGBTQ+ survivors of violence in humanitarian settings.
• Estimated Costs: $20 million to $30 million in total funding, with a portion directed toward LGBTQ+ survivors of violence.

7. International LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy Grants (Various Countries)

• Year Established: 2000s to Present
• Background: USAID has funded various small and medium-sized grants to organizations focused on advancing LGBTQ+ rights, providing legal defense, and combating violence.
• Support: Legal advocacy, decriminalization efforts, public awareness campaigns, and direct support to LGBTQ+ victims of violence and discrimination.
• Examples: Legal challenges to anti-LGBTQ+ laws in countries like Uganda and Tanzania, and public awareness campaigns in Eastern Europe and Latin America.
• Estimated Costs: Approximately $5 million to $10 million in grants to advocacy and legal reform organizations.

---

Chronological Summary with Associated Costs:

1. PEPFAR (HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care)
   • Year Established: 2003
   • Estimated Costs: $375 million for LGBTQ+ health initiatives within PEPFAR’s budget.
2. LGBTQ+ Health and Rights Programs
   • Year Established: Mid-2000s to Present
   • Estimated Costs: $20 million to $50 million annually.
3. Advancing LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy Programs
   • Year Established: Mid-2000s to Present
   • Estimated Costs: $5 million to $15 million annually.
4. Human Rights Support Fund
   • Year Established: Early 2000s to Present
   • Estimated Costs: $10 million to $30 million annually.
5. LGBT Global Health Fund
   • Year Established: 2010s
   • Estimated Costs: $15 million to $20 million annually.
6. Safe from the Start Initiative
   • Year Established: 2013
   • Estimated Costs: $20 million to $30 million in total funding.
7. International LGBTQ+ Rights and Advocacy Grants
   • Year Established: 2000s to Present
   • Estimated Costs: $5 million to $10 million in grants.

---

You raise an interesting point about the original intent of USAID’s mission and the shift toward funding more specialized programs, such as those focused on LGBTQ+ and transgender issues. Let’s explore the broader history of USAID to understand this transition.

The Original Mission of USAID

USAID was created in 1961 under the administration of President John F. Kennedy with the goal of promoting international development and humanitarian aid. The initial mission of USAID was focused on economic development, poverty reduction, and humanitarian assistance, including emergency food aid in regions facing natural disasters, droughts, famines, and economic instability.

• Early Focus (1960s-1980s): The early years of USAID’s existence were marked by a strong focus on addressing hunger and poverty through economic development programs, agricultural assistance, and food aid. This mission was in line with the broader goals of post-World War II reconstruction and the Cold War context, where USAID provided economic and development aid to countries in need to foster stability and prevent the spread of communism.
  • Examples of such programs: Food for Peace (established in 1954) provided humanitarian aid and emergency food assistance.

Shift Toward Health and Rights Initiatives

While USAID was founded with a focus on economic development and humanitarian aid, over time, the agency’s scope expanded to include a variety of social issues, including health, education, gender equality, and human rights. By the 1990s and 2000s, the focus of USAID shifted to a broader array of sectors, including health, governance, and rights-based programs, reflecting both evolving global priorities and advocacy from various civil society organizations.

• 1990s-2000s: USAID began to incorporate more diverse issues such as HIV/AIDS prevention, reproductive health, and gender equality into its portfolio.
  • Programs like PEPFAR (2003), which focused on combating the HIV/AIDS epidemic, particularly among at-risk groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender individuals, became prominent.

LGBTQ+ and Transgender-Focused Programs

The pivot toward supporting LGBTQ+ and transgender rights within USAID’s portfolio largely began in the 2000s, as global human rights movements gained momentum and LGBTQ+ advocacy became a more prominent part of the international discourse. This transition can be traced to a few key moments:

1. 2003: PEPFAR’s Focus on MSM and Key Populations
   • The PEPFAR program, established in 2003, started addressing HIV/AIDS in high-risk groups, including MSM and transgender individuals. This was an early indication that USAID’s mission had evolved beyond traditional aid to include specialized support for vulnerable populations.
2. 2006: Presidential Executive Order and LGBTQ+ Advocacy
   • In 2006, the United States government, through the work of NGOs and human rights groups, began a more concerted effort to address global LGBTQ+ rights and health. USAID started allocating more funds to programs that aimed to reduce discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ communities globally.
3. Mid-2000s to Early 2010s: Expanding Focus on Rights and Advocacy
   • USAID increasingly began investing in programs that supported legal reforms and advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, especially in countries where same-sex relationships were criminalized or LGBTQ+ individuals faced violence and persecution. These were part of a broader human rights agenda.

Did USAID “Lose Its Way”?

From a traditional perspective of emergency food aid, it’s understandable that some may view the pivot toward more specialized health, rights, and advocacy programs as a diversion from the agency’s original mission. However, several factors contributed to this shift:

• Evolving Global Needs: As global challenges evolved beyond just food insecurity to include health epidemics (HIV/AIDS), gender equality, and human rights issues, USAID’s mission adapted to meet these new priorities.
• Advocacy and International Pressure: The global movement for LGBTQ+ rights and gender equality gained traction during the late 20th century. International NGOs, UN bodies, and grassroots activists advocated for the inclusion of LGBTQ+ issues in international development efforts.
• Funding and U.S. Government Shifts: While some of the shifts in funding priorities may have been driven by political administration changes, such as the Obama administration’s support for LGBTQ+ rights, USAID continued to fund its traditional missions (such as food aid, education, and poverty reduction) alongside these newer initiatives.

Conclusion: A Broader Mission to Adapt to Global Needs

It is not necessarily accurate to say that USAID “lost its way.” The agency’s mission evolved to address global challenges beyond just food security, including health, human rights, and gender equality. These shifts were driven by both global challenges (such as the HIV/AIDS crisis) and advocacy from civil society groups who pushed for greater attention to LGBTQ+ and transgender rights.

The agency’s work with LGBTQ+ communities, while not initially part of its mandate, has become part of its broader effort to ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, have access to healthcare, human rights, and legal protection.

Thus, while USAID’s priorities may have shifted, this change reflects the broader transformation of international development aid to encompass a wide range of social, political, and health-related issues in a changing global landscape.

---

• $1.5 million to “advance diversity, equity, and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities.”
• $70,000 for the production of a “DEI musical” in Ireland.
• $2.5 million for electric vehicles in Vietnam.
• $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.
• $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru.
• $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala
• $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.
• Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations, even after an investigation was launched.
• $2 million + to EcoHealth Alliance, involved in research at the Wuhan lab.
• Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria.
• Funding to print “personalized” contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries.
• $16.8 million to support equitable outcomes in inclusion in Vietnam.
• $8.3 million for “equity and inclusion” education.
• $7.9 million to teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid “binary-gender language.”
• $6.3 million to study men having sex with other men in South Africa.
• $20 million for producing an Iraqi version of Sesame Street.
• $520 million for ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) consultants in Africa.
• $45 million for DEI scholarships in Burma.
• $2 million for Moroccan pottery classes.
• $2 million promoting tourism to Lebanon.
• Sent Ukrainians to Paris Fashion Week (specific amount not specified but highlighted for criticism).
• $200 million + of dollars to fund irrigation for the Taliban’s poppy fields.
• $50 million for condoms in Gaza.
• $30 million for South African HIV/AIDS programs, criticized for misuse or inefficiency.
• $25 million for green transportation projects in Georgia, mocked for suggesting Georgia needs Teslas.

---

And don’t forget what the NIH did to animals

Yes, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has funded research involving transgender surgeries and hormone therapies on animals. This has been a topic of controversy and scrutiny2. Investigations have revealed that millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on experiments where animals, such as mice, rats, and monkeys, underwent invasive surgeries and hormone treatments to mimic gender transitions.

These studies have been criticized for being both cruel and unnecessary, with critics arguing that the results are not always relevant to human biology and that alternative, non-animal testing methods could be more effective and ethical.

---

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) received funding for practicing transgender surgeries on animals paid for with taxpayer dollars. Specifically, the White Coat Waste Project revealed that over $10 million in taxpayer funds were spent on these experiments. This funding was allocated through various grants and was used for invasive surgeries and hormone therapies on animals like mice, rats, dogs, cats and monkeys.

---

This is what has happened to society and it will continue while you keep looking away. A transgender pet owner has had the atrocity done to his dog.

---

---