KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA MS-13

BY SNN.BZ STAFF

The Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Upholding Law, Security, and Presidential Authority. He wears no tattoos on his face but once his head was shaved the MS-13 moniker was tattooed on the back of his head in large letters. The mainstream media identifies him (on all stations) as a “Maryland Father.” Yes, he has procreated children but so have many other murderers. A “Maryland Father” is the least thing he is. Primarily, he was born and raised in El Salvador. He was a criminal there and on his way towards crossing our American border, he committed crimes all along the way. He has rapes womand children and has murdered adults and children. But what do Americans call him?
An “Maryland father.” People are so willing to march and protest for someone – anyone that they have no problem protesting on behalf of this criminal.

---

---

---

---

---

The narrative surrounding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national, has been muddied by misguided media portrayals that paint him as a victim rather than what he is: a convicted criminal with ties to terrorist organizations, rightfully deported to his country of origin. Let’s set the record straight.

Abrego Garcia was not sent to El Salvador “in error,” he was deported to El Salvador correctly because that is where he was born and grew up. His deportation was a proper act of justice, fully aligned with U.S. law and national security priorities.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court’s unanimous 9-0 ruling has reaffirmed that foreign policy, including decisions about who enters or remains in the United States, rests solely with the President. Rogue judges and activist media can no longer obstruct the will of the executive branch.

A Criminal, Not a Saint

Kilmar Abrego Garcia was born and raised in El Salvador, entering the United States illegally around 2011. Far from the “father of the year” image some media outlets have pushed, evidence points to his involvement with MS-13, a brutal gang designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Trump administration. MS-13 is notorious for its violence, including the murder of women and children—crimes that shred any claim to sympathy or leniency. Two courts reviewed Abrego Garcia’s case and found him to be a criminal, a determination that aligns with the need to protect American communities from dangerous individuals. The idea that his deportation was a mistake is a fabrication; his deportation was a lawful return to his homeland, consistent with U.S. immigration policy.

The Law is Clear: No Rights for Terrorists

Under U.S. law, members of terrorist organizations like MS-13 have no right to remain in the United States. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) explicitly bars individuals involved in terrorist activities from legal status, asylum, or protections against deportation. Section 212(a)(3)(B) of the INA lists terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility, ensuring that those who pose a threat to public safety are removed. Abrego Garcia’s deportation was not an accident—it was the system working as intended, prioritizing American lives over the interests of a foreign criminal.

Foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally, particularly those with ties to violence or terrorism, face a clear choice: self-deport or face consequences. Self-deportation allows individuals to return to their countries voluntarily, avoiding the hardship of detention and legal proceedings. Those who choose to remain unlawfully risk apprehension by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Once detained, they could spend months or even years in detention centers while their cases are processed. The message is simple: illegal presence in the U.S. is not a free pass, and the law will be enforced.

Supreme Court: Presidential Power is Absolute in Foreign Policy

The Supreme Court’s 9-0 ruling in the Abrego Garcia case delivered a resounding victory for President Trump and constitutional clarity. The Court affirmed that only the President of the United States has the authority to set foreign policy, including decisions about deportation and border security. This unanimous decision slapped down rogue judges who have, for too long, interfered with executive actions through activist rulings. The judiciary’s role is not to rewrite immigration policy or obstruct the President’s lawful directives—it is to respect the separation of powers.

In this case, the Supreme Court backed the findings of two lower courts that confirmed Abrego Garcia’s criminal status, while also clarifying that judicial overreach cannot override the President’s prerogative. President Trump’s policies—focused on deporting dangerous individuals and securing the border—are now shielded from rogue judges who prioritize ideology over national security. This ruling ensures that the executive branch can act decisively to protect Americans without fear of judicial sabotage.

Deportation, Not Error

The claim that Abrego Garcia was deported “in error” is a distortion meant to undermine the Trump administration’s commitment to law and order. His removal to El Salvador was intentional, lawful, and necessary. As a Salvadoran national with a criminal background, he had no legal right to remain in the U.S. The administration’s actions reflect a broader strategy: swiftly deporting those who threaten public safety, whether they entered illegally or abused temporary protections. The partnership with El Salvador, including the use of facilities like the CECOT prison, underscores a no-nonsense approach to handling deported criminals—ensuring they face justice rather than slip back into American communities.

A Warning to Illegal Immigrants

For those in the U.S. illegally, the path forward is clear. Self-deportation is the easiest way to avoid the uncertainty and hardship of detention. ICE has ramped up enforcement, and detention centers are prepared to hold those who defy the law.

These facilities, while humane, are not hotels (and they are not comfortable)—individuals could face prolonged stays as their cases wind through the system. The alternative is straightforward: return to your country of origin on your own. When you self deport, you are in control. If you stay, as happened to Abrego Garcia, you are staying with charges building against you constantly.

President Trump’s policies leave no room for ambiguity. The days of sanctuary cities and judicial interference are over. The Supreme Court has spoken, and the President’s authority is unquestionable. Illegal immigrants must weigh their options carefully: leave voluntarily or risk enforcement actions that could upend their lives.

Interpretation

Word of Advice for those who are still in the USA illegally

You can choose to use the software to self deport which keeps you free of incarceration and allows you to maintain your liberty and plan your next steps calmly and thoughtly on your time line.

If you choose to do nothing, it’s a matter of days or weeks before we come and take custody of you and we will hold you in a detention center for a few weeks or multiple years. Once you are in a detention center, it means that the US Government is aware that you have no applicable American rights. Once arrested, we cancel your visa, temporary status, green card, or any other method you have used in order to justify staying in the USA.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s arrest and deportation was no mistake — It was justice served.

As a criminal tied to a terrorist organization (MS-13), he forfeited any claim to remain in the United States. The Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling has cemented President Trump’s sole authority over foreign policy, ensuring that decisions about who enters or stays in America rest with the executive, not activist judges or a biased media.

For those still in the USA illegally, the choice is theirs: self-deport or face the full weight of the law. America’s safety comes first, and under President Trump, that principle will not waver.